QUOTE(JasonRainville @ Apr 20 2009, 10:56 PM)

The lighting is... quite odd.
The main problem is that there's a huge amount of ambient light whereas in space that would never happen. I was just about to ask where the sun was (being the main lightsource) when I noticed the moon in the background that has a massively contrasted shadow on the bottom right, throwing consistency out the window. Although it would make more sense visually to reconstruct the lighting to match with a single lightsource (along with some reflected light from the planet) a much easier and more advisable route would be to simply take the shadow off the moon and add some consistent lighting on the ship.
I have to admit I don't have much interest in lighting right now. Throwing it out the window. I understand that it can make for a more dramatic image, but that is not my purpose here. I mean, obviously I am not going for realism. In space, if you took a photo so close to the earth like this, NO stars would be visible. And doesn't that completely ruin the piece's message?
I am trying to make more of a collage sort of fusion. That's why the entire ship is cut from one piece of wood, and so is her dress although that's harder to notice. The moon is sort of just tacked on there, things are dimensional yet flat. For me it's like a modern folk art style. Not every style of art portrays lighting in a realistic way.. this style reflects my imagination much more than a dramatic, unified piece of (sur)realistic artwork.
I'm only so adamant against this suggestion because somehow adapting this artwork to have unified lighting would TOTALLY change its mood, feeling, style, and in the end what I am trying to portray. Somewhere down the line I may have a subject that requires more of the drama of lighting.