Politics - General Politics Blogs on Artician

Convers ve Sosyalizm by cekic

Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:55:33 EST

nsanlar kapitalizm iersindede onun ztt bir dzeni nasl savunabiliceklerine dair hakikaten birey bilmiyorlar gibi geliyor bana. Bilselerdi kendi donu gnde 1 dolara altrlan indeki ocuk iilerin ellerindende ktklarnda bilirlerdi bylece kp baka insanlara bok atma geleneindende kurtulmu olurlard .

Bilinmesi gereken udurki : Ben che damgal sweeti zerime giydiimde insanlar bunu ne iin giydiimi , ne anlama geldiini , hangi siyasi ideolojiyi temsil ettiimi biliyorlar. Azmza kadar kapitalizme boulduumuz bir ortamda ksaca kapitalizme zt yaamann mmkn olmad bir dnyada kiilerin ncelikleri sevselerde sevmeselerde mevcut dzene ayak uydurmak sonrasnda mevcut dzenin getirdikleriyle kendi ideolojilerni veya kapitalizme kar mcadele biimleri retmektir. Bugn dnyada Kapitalist olmayan birey olmad gibi Komnist olan milyonlarca insan vardr bu balamda insanlar bir dzene kar savarken as olan yaamaktr sizler bu dzen iersinde dlanrsanz , sizler bu dzen iersinde hor grlr pe atlrsanz sizin ideolojinizde sizi pe atanlar tarafndan pe atlm olur !

Aznza kadar kapitalizmin , sermayenin iinde boulmu iseniz baka insanlara komnist gibi yaa demeyede hakknz yoktur zira hi bir birey dnd gibi yaamak zorundada deildir . nemli olan uan ki dnya dzeni erevesinde kendi ideoljini nasl savunabildiindir eer doru savunabiliyorsan savunma biimin , eklin nemli deildir ! Sen Che damgal rozeti taktnda yakana bunun ne anlama geldiini bilmen nemlidir yoksa olaya le yani :

- O da emperyalizm mal komnist gibi yaa

slemi gibi bir sylemi syler iseniz msadenizlede senin donun benim donum ya in mal ya amerikan e nasl bir i kardeim bu diye soras geliyor insan haliyle

Ama lkemizde genlerimiz arasnda le bir drum var sosyalizmden bahseden insan veya o grteki insan isterse

Mavi jeans giysin

isterse gmelii sarar olsun

bunlar nemli deil dnyada ve trkiyede popler olan bir rn giyorsa o zaman komnistlikden kar

ama e senin donun amerikan mal e senin gmlein sarar marka ise e bu ne lahana turusu bu ne perhiz

Kiilerin ne giydii veya nasl yaad deil ideolojilerini bilip bilmedikleri ve hangi dzende olursa olsun onu nasl savunduklardr nemli olan

deoljilerde kritik nokta udurki

1- Kr krne bir gre balanmamak

2- Hayatn ve toplumdaki yerin ideolojilerin en byk paras olduunu bilmek

Aslnda bu 2 kuralda ideolojileri ideoloji yapan kuraldr sizin toplumda sevilen bir birey olmanz insanlarn sizin fikirlerinize hrmet , sayg edecei anlamnada gelir ama siz herkezin azna kadar kapitalizme boudluu bir ortamda kp baka insanalara madem u grtesin onun gibi yaa demeye hakknz YOKTUR !

Kapitalizm ile mcadele nce yaamay gerektirir nasl yaadn yada ne giydiini deil !

Most controversial statement of this term by Catarina

Tue, 5 May 2009 05:58:00 EST

" Feeding an illigal immigrant is giving a hand to overpopulation of the earth. "

The polical party who came up with this slogan is not even of an extemist foundation.

Looking at the illegal immigrants in my country, the statement could easily be interpreted as "Giving food to starving people is only helping overpopulation of the earth. "

I have no idea how other people feel about it.

My country is Belgium and other Belgians might very well be aware of what I'm talking about.

Since the illegal immigrants who are facing deportation are going on massive hungerstrikes.

I do understand how some see it as "blackmail".

On the other hand, despair can drive people far into doing things they never thought they would.

But I do sincerely stand by the belief that if a country has a somewhat stable economy and welfare, people wouldn't feel the need to migrate in such numbers, wars and famine, would you stay ?

I personally belief it's wrong to take it out on people who feel they have nowhere else to go and would rather starve themselves to death then to be deported back to their country .. is more then a the proverbial "sign on the wall" that starving to death is less worse then what they'd face back in their own country.

Bravo ARTICIAN ! by BenHeine

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:48:43 EST

Hello guys,

I'm brand new here on Artician.com.

I wanted to congratulate all the talented artists, web designers and developers involved in this fantastic project (mainly: Eric Zhivalyuk, Henry Paradiz, Brandon Lis, Chris Alfano and Daniel Gallegos). FINALLY, a site that represents a serious competitor to DeviantArt!

I'm a Belgian political artist (www.benheine.com). I used to be very active at DA untill some admins recently banned one of my political work: "God is Love - Use Condoms". I explain the whole story HERE. We argued somehow and I got permanently banned, which is a disgrace for me...

This wasn't a democratic decision from DeviantArt. This is a big loss for me, especially concerning the "human network" that I had built there (more than 4 thousands personal contacts, lots of personal and professional messages...) and all the personal and professional datas and high resolution files/illustrations that still remain on the Californian server but that I can't manage and control anymore...

ANYWAY, I'm now here, on Artician and this is a tremendous pleasure and honor for me.

See you around for more powerful and clever stuff...

POSTSCRIPT: because I find it a 'must read', I'm adding below the content of a blog post submitted by Akujin (Co-Founder of Artician.com) explaining Artician's policy towards "Free Speech" and "Censorship:

"Started as a comment reply to this blog post by Ben Heine.

Artician's job is to provide creative individuals a way to present their work. It is not to police the Internet. We only remove content in any form for being spam, illegal in the USA (hey, our servers are here), or for Copyright Infringement.

We take the approach that we are more of a host rather then a police of content so we will not remove anything for simply being offense to a single person. If you have multiple Admins who can be the judge, jury, and executioner of kicks/bans you will see a situation in which the various volunteers (and/or paid staff) of a website begin to develop their own moral compass on whether or not something must be removed or not.

I believe that if there's simply a solid, rigid rule that no content is removed except for complete, defined, reasons (like above) then you will see less of this type of thing happening.

Then again, why should you believe what I say?

The answer is simple: because I am a student of history. I know what Free Speech is. I know what Censorship is. I know the exact definitions of capitalism, communism, socialism, fascism, and I definitely know what a police state is. I also would like to think that I have a pretty decent grasp of how human nature works. With that being said, as long as I am part of the development team: I will continue to promote an atmosphere of intelligent debate, equal rights, and the freedom to say what you want without retribution on the part of the staff.

On top of this my world view is shaped not only by my knowledge of history but also from my background. I was born in Ukraine in 1987 under the former Soviet Union. Today, I'm an American citizen with extended family members in Germany and Israel as well as the United States. Even today though, despite having all my education in the US (school to college), I still speak to my grandparents in Russian. I can honestly say that because I know history, despite having been only 4 years old when the USSR collapsed, I am eternally grateful for that fact. And because I know all of this, I am tolerant of views that are contrary to my own, even if I disagree.

Having said all of this, it might be a good time to end this blog entry but there's still something I need to point out.

Artician has areas that are considered "public" and there's also that which is considered "private". For this reason while we may not delete an artwork submitted, we might decide to unlist it from Browse, Explore, or any other public listing. Likewise we might remove a forum post or thread if it offends specific people. This is because these areas are public and also because in public we need to show some restraint in provoking random visitors. On your own subdomain, however, you represent yourself and as such should be responsible for the content. So as long as it's not Spam, Illegal, or Copyright Infringing we will continue to tolerate it even if we disagree with it's content. Because removing your digital voice is like denying you to your digital habeas corpus."

Sadam and Three Musketeers by kman

Wed, 9 Apr 2008 03:10:33 EST

Paka paka pakachiva, peryamie e shlapoy, shudba ne rac shebtnut

Merci Bokou